Skip to content

Comparison Guides

DPL Elite vs CO₂ Resurfacing

Alexa CO₂ Aesthetic is ablative/fractional resurfacing; DPL Elite is non-ablative narrowband light for rejuvenation, pigment, and redness. CO₂ goes deeper with more downtime; DPL is lower-downtime.

By Laser Equipment Global Editorial Team · Last reviewed

What’s the difference between DPL Elite and CO₂ resurfacing?

DPL Elite and CO₂ resurfacing are both filed under “skin rejuvenation,” but they differ at the most basic level: CO₂ ablates tissue; DPL does not. CO₂ resurfacing (Alexa CO₂ Aesthetic) ablates tissue to correct texture, scars, and significant photoaging — deeper results with more downtime. DPL Elite is non-ablative narrowband light for tone, pigment, sun damage, and redness — lower downtime, lighter touch. That difference drives depth, downtime, and patient fit.

Two Pro 1 Laser platforms, two ends of the spectrum

Both platforms are in the Pro 1 Laser portfolio, and each owns one end of the menu. The DPL Elite is the everyday light platform — the device a clinic runs four or five days a week on tone, pigment, redness, acne support, and maintenance rejuvenation. The Alexa CO₂ Aesthetic is the corrective platform — the device a clinic books for the patient who wants meaningful resurfacing and accepts a recovery period for it. Most clinics that own both describe them as the two ends of one treatment menu rather than as alternatives.

Alexa CO₂ Aesthetic — ablative depth

The Alexa CO₂ Aesthetic is a fractional/ablative CO₂ platform that removes tissue to correct texture, scars, and significant photoaging — deeper correction across an intensity ladder, with more downtime.

It is available in 40 W (Alexa Aesthetic) and 60 W (Alexa Pro MVP 7) configurations, with fractional scanning up to a 30 mm area, articulated-arm beam delivery, and customizable scan shapes — and it extends beyond resurfacing into scar revision, soft-tissue work, Alexa Femme™, and Alexa Follicle™. Ablative CO₂ is commonly planned most conservatively in lighter Fitzpatrick skin types (I–III).

DPL Elite — non-ablative light

The DPL Elite is non-ablative narrowband light for tone, pigment, sun damage, and redness — a lower-downtime, lighter-touch rejuvenation path that doesn’t remove the surface.

It is a 4500 W vertical platform with selectable narrowband filter ranges (530–750, 530–950, 640–750, and 640–950 nm), a 15 × 50 mm treatment window, sapphire contact cooling near -5°C, and HR, SR, and AC treatment modes — five recurring categories (pigmentation, vascular redness, acne, skin rejuvenation, and selected hair reduction) from one device, across Fitzpatrick I–V with conservative settings as skin type requires. DPL vs IPL explains how narrowband filtering differs from broad-spectrum light.

Matching tool to goal

GoalBetter tool
Superficial pigment, sun damage, rednessDPL Elite
Lower-downtime tone/clarity rejuvenationDPL Elite
Deep texture, scars, significant photoagingCO₂ resurfacing
Maximum correction (with downtime)CO₂ resurfacing

What each lets the clinic offer and bill

The two platforms produce different revenue shapes, and the difference is the point.

  • DPL Elite: high-frequency, repeatable, lower-ticket. Price from your own fee schedule. As labeled examples, the DPL Elite revenue calculator bands photorejuvenation at $250–$600 per session (default $400) at four per week, pigmentation and sun damage at $200–$500 (default $300) at four per week, redness at $200–$500 (default $300), and acne treatment at $150–$400 (default $250). These are series-and-maintenance categories that keep a schedule full year-round.
  • Alexa CO₂: fewer, higher-ticket corrective sessions. The Alexa CO₂ calculator bands fractional CO₂ resurfacing at $500–$1,500 per session (default $800) and acne scar revision at $400–$1,200 (default $700), each at two per week — plus the surgical-scar, lesion, Alexa Femme™, and Alexa Follicle™ lines the same platform carries.
  • Platform economics. The DPL Elite’s lease-to-own entry point is $499/month (OAC); the Alexa CO₂ family starts from $799/month (OAC). Purchase pricing is on each device page, and the Canadian IPL/DPL and CO₂ cost guides give the market range. Enter your own prices and realistic volume; the bands are editable examples, not promises.

How to decide for your clinic

  • Buy the DPL Elite first if the clinic’s demand is tone, pigment, redness, and maintenance — the everyday concerns that fill a med-spa schedule — and if the patient base will not book downtime. Its breadth is what keeps it in use all week.
  • Buy the Alexa CO₂ first if the clinic is built around the corrective end: resurfacing, scar revision, and a patient base that comes for meaningful change and plans recovery around it. Adding CO₂ resurfacing to your clinic works through that business case.
  • Check the skin-type mix. A melanin-rich patient base is served more broadly by the DPL Elite’s documented I–V range than by ablative CO₂, which is planned most conservatively in lighter types.
  • Check the room. CO₂ requires wavelength-specific eyewear, plume evacuation, and fire precautions; the DPL Elite’s setup is lighter. The Alexa CO₂ and DPL Elite new-owner guides cover room preparation for each.

How to evaluate each platform

For a light platform, ask how the output is filtered (selectable narrowband ranges or one broad spectrum), what the treatment window and cooling are, which modes it offers, and what skin-type range its documentation supports; the narrowband IPL buying guide works through it. For a CO₂ platform, ask about power configuration, scan area and shape control, beam delivery, and room requirements; the aesthetic CO₂ laser buying guide covers the checklist. Both platforms include clinical training and onboarding and carry an 18-month warranty, with specifics stated in the written quotation.

Complementary across the spectrum

Many clinics offer both, covering the range from lower-downtime light rejuvenation to deeper resurfacing. The right single choice depends on the patient base and goals. In a clinic that runs both, the DPL Elite is also the maintenance platform for the CO₂ patient between resurfacing sessions — tone and pigment upkeep that keeps the corrective result looking its best and keeps the patient on the schedule.

Where to go next

Educational overview only. Suitability is determined by a trained provider.

Technologies covered

Related devices

Related Laser Equipment Global guides

FAQs

What's the difference between DPL and CO₂ resurfacing?

CO₂ resurfacing (e.g. Alexa CO₂ Aesthetic) ablates tissue to correct texture, scars, and significant photoaging — deeper results with more downtime. DPL Elite is non-ablative narrowband light for tone, pigment, sun damage, and redness — lower downtime, lighter touch. They suit different goals.

Which has more downtime?

Ablative CO₂ generally involves meaningfully more downtime than non-ablative DPL, because CO₂ removes tissue while DPL works through light without ablating the surface. Choice depends on the goal and the patient's downtime tolerance.

Which treats pigment and redness better?

For superficial pigment, sun damage, and diffuse redness, DPL's narrowband light is often the lighter-downtime choice. For deep texture, scars, and significant photoaging, CO₂ resurfacing corrects more. They're complementary.

Can a clinic offer both?

Yes — many do, to cover the spectrum from lower-downtime light rejuvenation (DPL) to deeper resurfacing (CO₂). The right single choice depends on the clinic's patient base and goals.

What do DPL and CO₂ resurfacing sessions bill?

Price from your own fee schedule. As labeled examples, the DPL Elite revenue calculator bands photorejuvenation at $250–$600 per session (default $400) at four per week and pigmentation at $200–$500 (default $300); the Alexa CO₂ calculator bands fractional CO₂ resurfacing at $500–$1,500 (default $800) at two per week. DPL is higher-frequency, lower-ticket, repeatable work; CO₂ is fewer, higher-ticket corrective sessions. Examples, not promises.

Explore the technology

Explore the DPL Elite → Dynamic Pulsed Light (DPL)Fractional CO₂ Laser

Ask About Training