Skip to content

Melasma

Melasma is among the most demanding pigment presentations a clinic takes on, and the approach differs from ordinary pigment work. Laser Equipment Global publishes clinical education, operator training, treatment-protocol guidance and platform comparisons for providers deciding whether and how to offer it.

Melasma rewards restraint. Much of the material below is about what not to do — where heat, aggressive settings or the wrong modality can set a patient back rather than move them forward. If you are weighing melasma as a service line, start with how it differs from ordinary pigment, then work toward protocol and platform.

Understanding the condition

Why melasma behaves differently from other pigment, and what that means for a clinic taking these cases on.

Protocols and operator training

What a treating clinician needs to understand before the first session. Full parameters live in the gated owner portal, not on public pages.

Comparing approaches

How picosecond treatment sits against the other modalities a clinic might already own or be considering.

  • Pico Laser vs IPL for Melasma — Pico vs IPL for melasma — why melanin-sparing 1064 nm picosecond is the preferred choice over heat-heavy IPL for this rebound-prone condition.
  • Pico Laser vs Q-Switched Nd:YAG for Melasma — Choosing a melasma platform: how 1064 nm picosecond compares with Q-switched Nd:YAG on pulse duration, heat, rebound risk and patient selection.
  • Pico Laser vs Chemical Peels for Melasma — Pico laser vs chemical peels for melasma — why gentle 1064 nm picosecond beats aggressive peels on rebound risk and depth control.
  • DPL Elite vs Pro 1 Pico — How DPL Elite and Pro 1 Pico fit together — narrowband light-based breadth vs photoacoustic picosecond laser for pigment, tattoo, and fractional remodeling.

Choosing a platform

What to weigh commercially if melasma is going to be a service line rather than an occasional case.

Related

Ask About Training · Ask About Financing ·